Recently I completed a course on the European Media Policy, which deserves a long discussion of its own. However, one thing I learned from there that I really want to share is Europeana.eu – European Commission’s response to Google Books.
Google started working on digitizing books in 2002 and officially launched Google Books a few years later. They received initial support from top libraries (like Harvard, Oxford, Stanford, Uni of Michigan, New York Public Library), world’s leading publishers (like Blackwell, Penguin, Pearson, Springer) and even partnered with a number of European countries (including Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Netherlands).
Everything was good and dandy when Google was helping libraries and publishers digitize their archives. Though things changed once Google Books became a global success and Google grew to be a tech giant with soaring profits.
Many European publishers started voicing concerns that their national archives are being exploited by an American company. That’s when the European Commission came to ‘rescue’ and came up with Europeana. What better way to protect European national archives from exploitation than to create an own version of Google Books? What is more, the platform would link to paintings, photos and videos on top of literary publications!
And in true European Commission fashion the content would come from member-states who were given quotas of how many items they need to digitize. The quota was based on the country’s economy size (!), thus countries like France, Germany, Spain, Italy and Netherlands were asked to contribute 1-3M digitized items and smaller economies like Poland or Finland were asked just over 0.5M.
Needless to say, European Commission and Culture Ministries of member-states poured in plenty of money and resources (read: tax-payers money) into this. The looming question is: why? Have YOU ever heard of Europeana? Once you try it: do you actually like it?
I played around with Europeana and I feel like their stuff of 47 did little user testing or marketing. True enough there is a lot of multilingual content but it is often limited in choice with very crappy preview (you have to click to see the next page as opposed to easily scrolling down).
It took me 5 seconds and no pain to find what I was looking for on Google Books. Five minutes and a lot of frustration later and I still can’t find it on Europeana. But hey, at least their links to images of Mona Lisa are legal (even if they don’t appear on the first page when you search for ‘mona lisa’).
Google is far from perfect but if Europe needs to come up with an alternative perhaps the European Commission is not the best place to start.
Google started working on digitizing books in 2002 and officially launched Google Books a few years later. They received initial support from top libraries (like Harvard, Oxford, Stanford, Uni of Michigan, New York Public Library), world’s leading publishers (like Blackwell, Penguin, Pearson, Springer) and even partnered with a number of European countries (including Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Netherlands).
Everything was good and dandy when Google was helping libraries and publishers digitize their archives. Though things changed once Google Books became a global success and Google grew to be a tech giant with soaring profits.
Many European publishers started voicing concerns that their national archives are being exploited by an American company. That’s when the European Commission came to ‘rescue’ and came up with Europeana. What better way to protect European national archives from exploitation than to create an own version of Google Books? What is more, the platform would link to paintings, photos and videos on top of literary publications!
And in true European Commission fashion the content would come from member-states who were given quotas of how many items they need to digitize. The quota was based on the country’s economy size (!), thus countries like France, Germany, Spain, Italy and Netherlands were asked to contribute 1-3M digitized items and smaller economies like Poland or Finland were asked just over 0.5M.
Needless to say, European Commission and Culture Ministries of member-states poured in plenty of money and resources (read: tax-payers money) into this. The looming question is: why? Have YOU ever heard of Europeana? Once you try it: do you actually like it?
I played around with Europeana and I feel like their stuff of 47 did little user testing or marketing. True enough there is a lot of multilingual content but it is often limited in choice with very crappy preview (you have to click to see the next page as opposed to easily scrolling down).
It took me 5 seconds and no pain to find what I was looking for on Google Books. Five minutes and a lot of frustration later and I still can’t find it on Europeana. But hey, at least their links to images of Mona Lisa are legal (even if they don’t appear on the first page when you search for ‘mona lisa’).
Google is far from perfect but if Europe needs to come up with an alternative perhaps the European Commission is not the best place to start.




